A Shoemaker's Story: Being Chiefly about French Canadian Immigrants, Enterprising Photographers, Rascal Yankees, and Chinese Cobblers in a Nineteenth-Century Factory Town
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Anthony W. Lee. A Shoemaker's Story: Being Chiefly about French Canadian Immigrants, Enterprising Photographers, Rascal Yankees, and Chinese Cobblers in a Nineteenth-Century Factory Town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 2008. 314 pages. $45 (cloth). In 1870 workers at a North shoe factory went out on strike to their employer, manufacturing Calvin Sampson, to bargain with their union. Sampson, having not the slightest intention negotiating, immediately set out to replace them. Finding a new source of labor proved difficult, however, as the workers he brought in from regions were consistently either to work as scabs or were union members. Recognizing he to find workers that would not be pulled in by sentiments of union or ethnic solidarity, Sampson broadened his horizons and sent for a crew of Chinese immigrants to be brought in from San Francisco on the newly completed transcontinental railroad. Taking the bold step of importing replacement workers from China set offa storm of protests and national interest. It also successfully broke the strike and resulted in Chinese workers residing in the small New England town for the next decade. Ten years later, the anti-Chinese hysteria that preceded the Chinese Exclusion Act neared its apex, but with the local union ground into dust, Sampson simply declined to renew his contract with the Chinese workers and they vanished from the area never to return. A Shoemakers ' Story gives us a history of these events, offering an instructive and vividly written case study into the development of industry and unions, the deskilling of labor, the growth of immigration, and the transformation of identities that characterized post Civil War America. Lee successfully integrates the localized history in North Adams to the national and international current of events, ranging from the economic underpinnings of the French Canadian diaspora to the ethnic and cultural heterogeneousness of Chinese immigrants. More than a simple history, Lee tells this story by exploring the various visual documents left behind by the main participants, primarily in photographs. He centers his narrative around a photograph of the newly arrived Chinese workers standing in front of the North Adams shoe factory. Sampson inexplicably arranged to have the photo taken in the midst of the drama and protest of the very day of the Chinese workers arrival, when thousands had gathered to protest, and Sampson himself was carrying numerous firearms in anticipation of a fight. Lee investigates what each of the major protagonists saw in this photograph and the events surrounding it, giving each perspective an entire chapter to be explored: the shoe manufacturer, the photographers, French Canadian union workers, and the Chinese workers. In each of these chapters, Lee contextualizes and unpacks how the various groups were affected and responded to the arrival of the Chinese in North Adams. But reviewing the flood of photographic documents that resulted remains his focus. As an art historian, Lee shows his talents by offering rich analysis of the images that beautifully illustrate the pages of this book. He not only uses the photographs as a means to shed light on how the groups viewed themselves and wanted others to see them, but also as a way to show how the visual culture created by these photographs formed a new medium for struggle, conflict, and expression. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.084 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".