MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575934801 · doi:10.1002/qsar.200390022

Quantitative Structure Activity Relationships for Predicting the Bioaccumulation of POPs in Terrestrial Food‐Webs

2003· article· en· W1575934801 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueQSAR & Combinatorial Science · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiomagnificationBioaccumulationFood chainEnvironmental chemistryBioconcentrationChemistryBiotaEnvironmental scienceEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract K OW based QSARs are used to assess the bioaccumulation potential of thousands of commercial chemicals in Canada and internationally. The QSARs, which are based on information from aquatic organisms, identify chemicals with a log K OW >5 to have a potential to biomagnify in food‐chains. This study investigates whether K OW based QSARs are also effective in identifying biomagnifying chemicals in terrestrial food‐chains. First, a terrestrial bioaccumulation model is developed and used to hypothesize the general relationship between the chemical's octanol‐air and octanol‐water partition and its biomagnification potential. Secondly, field observations of the bioaccumulation of persistent organic pollutants in wolves are used to test the hypothesis and explore the fundamental differences between QSARs for bioaccumulation in aquatic and terrestrial food‐chains. The results indicate that (i) QSARs for bioaccumulation in terrestrial food‐chains should include both octanol‐air (K OA ) and octanol water partition coefficients (K OW ); (ii) chemicals with a log K OA >approximately 5 can biomagnify in terrestrial food‐chains if log K OW >2 and the rate chemical transformation or metabolism is low; (iii) biomagnification factors in terrestrial food‐chains are much greater than those in aquatic food‐chains; (iv) biomagnification factors of very hydrophobic substances (log K OW >7) in terrestrial biota do not drop off with increasing K OW as has been observed in aquatic biota. The relevance of these findings is that current regulations and protocols may misidentify (i) low K OW but high K OA chemicals as having no bioaccumulation potential and (ii) very hydrophobic (log K OW >8.5) which appear not to biomagnify in aquatic organisms but have the potential to biomagnify in terrestrial food‐chains. Considering that 67.9% of the approximately 12 000 organic chemicals on Canada's Domestic Substances List exhibit high K OA but low K OW , this represents a major gap in our methods for screening bioaccumulative substances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.153
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it