MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1575993040 · doi:10.1093/fs/knq206

The French Atlantic: Travels in Culture and History The French Atlantic: Travels in Culture and History. By B <scp>ill</scp> M <scp>arshall</scp> . (Contemporary French and Francophone Cultures, 9). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2009. x + 375 pp, pl., ill., maps. Hb £65.00. Pb £19.95.

2010· article· en· W1575993040 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Britton

Bibliographic record

VenueFrench Studies · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMillerTheme (computing)PoliticsHistorySettlement (finance)SurpriseRelation (database)Art historyGeographyHumanitiesMedia studiesCartographyArtSociologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This book is in some sense a continuation of the project that Bill Marshall inaugurated in 2005 with his edition of the encyclopedia France and the Americas: Culture, Politics and History (Santa Barbara, CA: ABC-CLIO). It also shares similarities with Christopher L. Miller's The French Atlantic Triangle: Literature and Culture of the Slave Trade (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008; see FS, 63 (2009), 121–22); but it covers a far wider area, both geographically and thematically: while the slave trade is a recurrent theme in Marshall's book, it is by no means the only one. Given Marshall's previous work in French Canadian culture, the latter's prominence here comes as no surprise. But what is both new and very stimulating in relation to previous work in cultural history is the use of place as the organizing category. The book's seven main chapters are devoted to Nantes, La Rochelle, Saint-Pierre et Miquelon, Quebec City, New Orleans, Cayenne, and Montevideo; each one combines a historical account concentrating on patterns of French migration and settlement in the city (or islands) in question, with a discussion of its representations in literature and film. There is a conscious concern to ground the cultural analysis in its material determinants, and also to focus on less canonical places: Guyane rather than Martinique or Guadeloupe, Quebec City rather than Montreal, Nantes and La Rochelle rather than Bordeaux. The book's central aim is to replace the centre–periphery model of Frenchness, in which the metropole is endowed with the prestige of source and origin, with a mobile diasporic topography and a sensitivity to the interaction of centripetal and centrifugal forces. The introduction develops this theoretical framework in relation to three precursors: Paul Gilroy's conception of the Black Atlantic, Édouard Glissant's creolization and Relation, and, above all, Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari's Mille plateaux. Deleuzean notions of deterritorialization, the ‘minor’, and the ‘molecular’ inform the whole book: Marshall is careful not to draw general conclusions, but produces series of fairly brief, often witty, descriptions of particular, discrete texts and historical incidents. This ‘molecular’ attention to ‘the line of flight of particles’ (p. 18) demands a certain mental agility on the part of the reader, who occasionally — in this reader's case, anyway — feels that too many molecules have been crammed into one sentence. It also means that the book is rather curiously positioned in relation to the notion of argument: its whole structure, the selection and organization of its material, and its theoretical introduction constitute an argument against a more conventional conception of Frenchness and its diffusion; but within each individual chapter, the book is entirely descriptive. Thus it is the level of sheer interest aroused by Marshall's descriptions — particularly of previously underdocumented areas such as the very significant French immigration to Uruguay, the role of Saint-Pierre et Miquelon during prohibition in the USA, or the interaction between slaves and French convicts in Cayenne — that fully vindicates the book's commitment to opening up a new perspective both on the French Atlantic and on cultural history more generally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.621
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0540.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrench StudiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207