Analysis of the Complex (5s5p<sup>2</sup>+5s4f5p+5s<sup>2</sup>5d)–(5p<sup>3</sup>+5s5p5d+4f5p<sup>2</sup>+5s<sup>2</sup>6p+5s<sup>2</sup>5f) Transition Array of Eight-times Ionized Lanthanum (La IX)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The spectrum of lanthanum was recorded in the 300–1240 Å region on a variety of normal incidence and grazing incidence spectrographs. The sources used for exciting the spectra were either a conventional triggered spark or a laser produced plasma. The analysis of complex (5s5p 2 +5s4f5p+5s 2 5d)–(5p 3 +5s5p5d+4f5p 2 +5s 2 6p+5s 2 5f) transition arrays was carried out. All these odd parity configurations have been studied for the first time. Sixty out of sixty-two possible levels in this odd parity system were established. Five levels belonging to the 5s4f5p even parity configuration, not established in the earlier study, have also been found and the level value of the 5s4f5p 2 G 7/2 was revised. 155 additional lines have been classified in the 363–870 Å region. The measured energies were satisfactorily interpreted by least-squares-fitting parametric Hartree-Fock calculations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".