MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576204991 · doi:10.18192/analyses.v1i1.438

Personne n’a dit que Guillaume Dustan était un intellectuel, ou les raisons d’un échec

2006· article· fr· W1576204991 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Vrydaghs

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalyses Revue de littératures franco-canadiennes et québécoise · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMilitantPhilosophyArtPoliticsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guillaume Dustan (1965-2005), écrivain homosexuel français, est progressivement venu dans ses écrits au militantisme. Celui-ci fut d’abord gay dans Nicolas Pages (1999), pour ensuite se muer, avec Génie divin (2001), en une défense du libre-arbitre adressée à la société dans son ensemble. On se propose de retracer ce parcours singulier et d’expliquer les raisons de l’échec de ce militantisme à l’aide de la sociologie des champs et de la sociopoétique.AbstractThe French gay writer Guillaume Dustan became gradually a militant in his books. Activist for gays rights with Nicolas Pages (1999), he changed himself to free-will-defender against society with Génie divin (2001). Fields sociology and sociopoetics will enable to show this singular way and to explain why this militantism fails.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalyses Revue de littératures franco-canadiennes et québécoiseSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207