MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576324336 · doi:10.1109/cec.2005.1554824

CasGP: Building Cascaded Hierarchical Models Using Niching

2005· article· en· W1576324336 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEvolutionary Algorithms and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScalabilityLayer (electronics)Metric (unit)CascadeGenetic programmingFunction (biology)Selection (genetic algorithm)Feature (linguistics)Genetic algorithmDynamic programmingMathematical optimizationAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceData miningMachine learningMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A cascaded model is introduced for mining large datasets using genetic programming without recourse to specialist hardware. Such an algorithm satisfies the seeming conflicting requirements of scalability and accuracy on large datasets by incrementally building GP classifiers through the use of a hierarchical dynamic subset selection algorithm. Models are built incrementally with each layer of the cascade receiving as input the original feature vector, plus the output from the previous layer(s). In order to encourage each layer to explicitly solve new aspects of the problem a combination of sum square error and niching is utilized. Thus, previous layers of the model are considered a niche, and the cost function is a shared error metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.860
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvolutionary Algorithms and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207