MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576347838

A New Look at the HI in the Fourth Quadrant

2004· article· en· W1576347838 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. M. Dickey, N. M. McClure‐Griffiths, B. M. Gaensler, A. J. Green

Bibliographic record

VenueeCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMilky WayLongitudePhysicsAstrophysicsGalactic planeLatitudeGalaxyAstronomySpiral galaxyQuadrant (abdomen)Supermassive black holeGeodesyGeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using data from the Southern Galactic Plane Survey we have new measurements of the properties of the Milky Way disk in the fourth quadrant, in particular an apparent continuation of the Perseus Arm that extends more than 20 kpc from the Galactic Center. A new generation of HI line and continuum surveys of the Milky Way is underway under the umbrella of the International Galactic Plane Survey (IGPS). These three surveys, the Southern (SGPS, McClure-Griffiths et al. 2001), Canadian (CGPS, Taylor et al. 2003), and VLA (VGPS, Taylor et al. 2002) Surveys, covering longitude ranges 253-357, 65-180, and 18-67 respectively, include combined single dish and interferometer data to achieve resolution approaching 1 with sensitivity to all larger angular scales. The results will allow us to study the HI layer of the Galaxy in unprecedented detail, to map the global properties of the disk such as the midplane position (corrugations), scale height (flare), and large scale features in the surface density such as spiral arms. This paper presents some examples of analysis of the SGPS data to study the outer Galaxy in the fourth quadrant. The left-hand panels of Figure 1 show longitude-velocity diagrams for a few representative latitude ranges; each is an average over several beamwidths, from top to bottom the latitude ranges are +0.35 to +0.45, -0.05 to +0.05, and -0.45 to -0.35. At the heavily degraded resolution and dynamic range of figure 1 the differences among these three l-v diagrams are hard to see, except in the outer Galaxy (positive velocities) where the latitude ranges have spread apart in z by 100 pc or so (distances greater than 15 kpc). The right-hand panels of figure 1 show the latitude moments of the longitudevelocity diagram, i.e. the integrals over the latitude range of the SGPS survey of the brightness temperature weighted by the latitude taken to the power n, as

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesFrench-language works237,207