Genèse de la campagne antiminière d’Esquel en 2002–2003: entre innovation et continuité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article examines the collective action experience of the Asamblea de Vecinos Autoconvocados de Esquel of 2002–2003 in Argentine Patagonia that led to the suspension of an important mining project. This experience has served as an inspiration and starting point in the formation of a national socio-environmental movement, today personified by the Unión de Asambleas Ciudadanas. We insert this collective action struggle into Argentina’s sociopolitical context at the beginning of the last decade and in the social mobilization tradition that has greatly influenced its recent history. We base our analysis on theoretical concepts derived from the “political process” school of thought that we combine with the extensive literature related to collective action published in Argentina. We defend the hypothesis that both the political opportunity structure faced by Esquel militants and the legacy of various Argentinian social movements contribute to explain the main characteristics of the mobilization model articulated in Esquel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".