A Sala Islâmica, Museu de Faro, Portugal: análise do projeto de gestão
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho visa fazer um estudo sobre o projeto de gestao dos objetos que formam a exposicao “A Sala Islâmica” , que se encontra exposta no Museu Municipal de Faro, na cidade de Faro, em Portugal. Para tanto, foi feita a analise do espolio existente no complexo expositivo, dividindo-o em tipologias de acordo com a funcionalidade e organizando-o na forma de um catalogo que tem por objetivo facilitar a analise das pecas. Nessa analise, a preocupacao foi a de perceber quais foram as intervencoes feitas no acervo, alem dos estudos ja realizados, bem como formas de divulgacao do mesmo. Foi feito um rapido estudo sobre a historia da presenca islâmica na regiao, para que pudesse ser compreendido o motivo da existencia de uma sala islâmica no Museu. Palavras-chave : Faro; Portugal; Museu; Arte Islâmica; Gestao de acervos. Abstract This text presents a study on the project management of the objects that form the exhibition The Islamic Room , which is exposed in the Municipal Museum of Faro in Faro, Portugal. For this analysis, was made of the existing works in the exhibition complex, dividing it into types according to functionality, and also organized a sort of book that aims to facilitate the analysis of the parts. This analysis was concerned to understand what were the speeches made in the collection, in addition to previous studies, as well as forms of disclosure. As a supplement, it made a quick study on the history of the Islamic presence in the region, so it could be better understood the reason for the existence of a room in the Islamic Museum. Key-words : Faro. Portugal. Museum. Islamic Art. Collection management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".