MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1576753489

Shift Work, Noise Exposure and Hearing Loss

2010· article· en· W1576753489 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tim Kelsall, Alberto Behar

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEffects of Vibration on Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcousticsNoise-induced hearing lossHearing lossAudiologyNoise (video)Noise exposureIndustrial noiseEnvironmental scienceComputer sciencePhysicsMedicine
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-traditional work shifts such as 12 hours shifts with 3 days on and 2 days off are changing the workplace yet noise regulations use a standard 8 hour shift to evaluate noise.This means that employees with identical long term exposure can have, in the example case, 2 dB different noise exposures.This paper presents the issues both in terms of the difference in measurements but also in terms of the difference in the effect of such shifts on employees' hearing.More and more industries are abandoning the traditional 8 hour day, 40 hour week in favor of 12 hour shifts, often with 3 days on, 2 days off.Another variation is to work 3 weeks with 1 week off.Although in the long term there is little difference in hours per month or hours per year, the short term effect is a 50% increase in work hours on a particular day.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicEffects of Vibration on HealthFrench-language works237,207