« Valeur ajoutée » : Graal du repositionnement stratégique de l’industrie agroalimentaire québécoise
Bibliographic record
Abstract
De 2006 à 2011, se sont dessinées au Québec les grandes lignes d’une nouvelle politique « biolamentaire » que synthétise un Livre vert rendu public au printemps 2011. Des éléments du débat qui anime l’arène politique peuvent être mis en lumière en les resituant dans le contexte de l’évolution récente de l’industrie agroalimentaire. L’objectif du présent article consistera à montrer que le déploiement mondial des opérations de multinationales impliquées dans la transformation alimentaire et la centralisation des systèmes de distribution sur une base nationale, ont concouru à l’ébauche de stratégies concurrentielles axées sur la commercialisation d’aliments à valeur ajoutée, stratégies ayant mené, dans le mouvement, à un questionnement sur le fonctionnement de la mise en marché collective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".