Cooperative platform between professors and students facilitating the transmission and documentation of research results
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le projet JoBoCo : Journal de bord et de connaissance visait au dveloppement d'un outil informatique dynamique et collaboratif favorisant l'encadrement des activits de recherche des tudiants aux cycles suprieurs et assurant la formation de ces derniers aux bonnes pratiques de laboratoire.Les pratiques d 'encadrements des professeurs-chercheurs et les besoins des tudiants-chercheurs ont t valus en mme temps qu'un recensement des outils informatiques existant.Suite cet exercice, plusieurs logiciels ont t valus et un systme bas sur l 'utilisation intgre des logiciels Group-Office, Mendeley et WordPress a t retenu.Ce systme intgr est maintenant utilis par plusieurs quipes de recherche en acoustique au dpartement de gnie mcanique de l 'cole de technologie suprieure et devrait permettre, une fois les problmes de dploiement du systme et de formation des utilisateurs rsolus, d 'aider les professeurs activement impliqus dans la formation et l'encadrement d'tudiants aux cycles suprieurs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".