MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577198986 · doi:10.3968/7041

Study on Reinjection Technology of Sewage With SO 4 2+ in Oilfield

2015· article· en· W1577198986 on OpenAlex
Dong Zhang, Wenxiang Wu

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in petroleum exploration and development · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeoscience and Mining Technology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloggingIon exchangeAlkali metalSewageChemistryFormation waterIon-exchange resinIonEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringInorganic chemistryPetroleum engineeringGeologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SO 4 2- rich in reinjection sewage combined with Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ in formation water to form precipitate which results clogging in the formation pore. Ion exchange method was chosen to remove SO 4 2- in reinjection sewage and the anion exchange resin with OH - is selected as the exchange medium. It is necessary to evaluate alkali sensitivity of the formation rock due to the reinjection of sewage containing excess OH - . The results indicate that ion exchange method can remove more than 90% of the SO 4 2+ and the rate of formation damage is negligible when the pH below the critical of 9.8. Key words: SO 4 2- ; Ion exchange method; Scaling; Alkali sensitivity

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it