MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

PLGA nanoparticle-entrapped inactivated porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine coadministered intranasally with a potent adjuvant elicits cross-protective immunity in the pig respiratory system (VAC7P.981)

2014· article· en· W1577305269 on OpenAlexaff
Basavaraj Binjawadagi, Varun Dwivedi, Cordelia Manickam, Kang Ouyang, Jordi Torrelles

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Virus Infections Studies
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPorcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virusVirologyAdjuvantImmunityImmunogenicityImmune systemBiologyVirusVaccinationNasal administrationAntibodyImmunologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) is caused by a highly mutagenic RNA virus, PRRS virus (PRRSV). Currently used vaccines have failed to prevent PRRS outbreaks induced losses of estimated one billion dollar annually to the US pig farmers. The PRRSV infects primarily the lung macrophages. Because of safety advantage, we attempted to strengthen the immunogenicity of killed PRRSV vaccine antigens (KAg) in the pig respiratory system. We entrapped the KAg in biodegradable PLGA nanoparticles (NP-KAg) and coadministered the NP-KAg with a potent mucosal adjuvant, whole cell lysate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tb WCL), twice intranasally to growing pigs and challenged with a heterologous virus. Our results indicated that formulation of NP-KAg and unentrapped soluble M. tb WCL significantly cleared detectable replicating infective PRRSV with a 10-fold reduction in viral RNA load in the lungs, associated with substantially reduced microscopic lung pathology. Immunologically, enhanced virus neutralizing antibody titers by high avidity antibodies and augmented populations of IFN-γ secreting CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, and reduced secretion of TGFbeta was detected in the lungs. Currently, we are in the process of identifying PRRSV epitope-specific T-cell response and frequency of apoptotic/necrotic immune cells in the lungs of vaccinated pigs. In conclusion, our vaccine formulation elicited broadly cross-protective anti-PRRSV immunity in the pig respiratory system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicAnimal Virus Infections StudiesFrench-language works237,207