MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1577349897 · doi:10.5935/1414-8145.20130015

VULNERABILIDADE AO ADOECIMENTO DE CRIANÇAS COM HIV/AIDS EM TRANSIÇÃO DA INFÂNCIA PARA A ADOLESCÊNCIA

2013· article· pt· W1577349897 on OpenAlexaff
Renata de Moura Bubadué, Cristiane Cardoso de Paula, Franco A. Carnevale, Sandra Catalina Ochoa Marín, Crhis Netto de Brum, Stela Maris de Mello Padoin

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)PopulationGynecologyPsychologyGerontologyFamily medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJETIVO: identificar situações de vulnerabilidade ao adoecimento de pacientes com HIV/AIDS durante a transição da infância para a adolescência. MÉTODOS: pesquisa qualitativa com análise de conteúdo temática de banco de entrevistas realizadas com 11 sujeitos de 12 a 14 anos, infectados por transmissão vertical e com revelação diagnóstica. RESULTADOS: no plano individual, foram observados: saber do diagnóstico e não poder falar; reação negativa ao diagnóstico; assumir responsabilidades de se cuidar; dificuldades para tomar os remédios. No plano social: orfandade e/ou adoecimento de um familiar; contar para as outras pessoas o diagnóstico; necessidade de ajuda para lembrarse de tomar o remédio; namoro e início da vida sexual. CONCLUSÃO: ressalta-se a importância de uma equipe multidisciplinar capacitada para atender às demandas de saúde específicas dessa população, para promover a autonomia do cuidado de si e a inserção social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.229
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)→Same topicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions→French-language works237,207→