Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The multidisciplinary scholarship on migration to Canada is increasingly attentive to how gender – as ideology and a set of social relations – has centrally shaped immigration policies, patterns, and outcomes for different migrant and diasporic communities, regions, and the country as a whole. While some Canadian migration scholars have long argued that migration is gendered (Boyd 1986), researchers and policy‐makers have for the most part ignored female migrants and women left behind, and failed to consider how gender should be taken into account in analysis of male as well as female migration. Only recently has migration scholarship gone beyond counting women migrants to consider gender a key organizing principle of the reasons, processes, and outcomes of migration. This intensified interest has no doubt been provoked by the “feminisation of migration,” i.e., an increase in international female migration, that is, in the Canadian context, on a par with male migration (Castles & Miller 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it