Sand Volume and Distribution on the Paraglacial Inner Continental Shelf of the Northwestern Gulf of Maine
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an extensive program of side-scan sonar and seismic reflection profiling, bottom sampling and vibracoring, we have mapped the western Gulf of Maine between Canada and Massachusetts, from the shoreline to the 100 m isobath. The purpose of the program was, in part, to locate and evaluate sand resources on the inner shelf. Surficial sand occurs on only 7% of this formerly glaciated region, and most is located seaward of southern Maine's large beaches in Wells Embayment, Saco Bay, and off Cape Small. Sand deposits occur 1) at the lowstand position of sea level, between 50 and 60 m depth, 2) on parts of the inner shelf between 50 m and the shoreface, and 3) in the shoreface. A paleodelta of the region's largest river, the Kennebec, occurs off Cape Small. Elsewhere, the lowstand deposits are thinner ( 5 m of relief on the inner shelf and contain large quantities of material. The shoreface contains the greatest concentration of sand in each of the regions. A wedge-shaped deposit of sand overlies estuarine muddy sands in each area and is inferred to have formed during a slowdown in the rate of sea-level rise between 7.5 and 9.5 ka. The volume of shoreface sand varies from less than 60 million cubic meters in Saco Bay to more than 300 million cubic meters off Cape Small, and is loosely correlated with the erosional state of adjacent beaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it