Philippe RIVIALE, L'impatience du bonheur. Apologie de Gracchus Babeuf, Paris, Payot et Rivages, Critique de la Politique Payot, 2001, 275 p.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Philippe Riviale, bien connu pour ses travaux sur des penseurs du XIX e siècle, notamment Tocqueville et Charles Fourier et qui a déjà publié un essai sur la Conjuration (1994), propose dans ce livre une relecture des textes de Babeuf.Trois parties tentent avec bonheur de rendre la parole effacée du Tribun, d'abord grâce à son journal, puis en suivant les développements de la Conjuration des Égaux, à travers la défense de Babeuf enfin, et celle des principaux accusés lors du procès devant la Haute Cour de Vendôme.Ce faisant, il rompt avec l'historiographie marxiste qui faisait de Babeuf un précurseur de l'idée communiste, même s'il utilise les textes publiés avant lui par des historiens du babouvisme comme Victor Daline.La démarche est intéressante, car si la Conjuration des Égaux a fait couler beaucoup d'encre, la figure de Babeuf demeure énigmatique ; l'analyse des textes de la période trouble de Thermidor et du Directoire a le mérite de lui redonner sa singularité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".