MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577572515 · doi:10.1109/icmens.2004.1508942

Finite Element Simulations of Transient Droplet Deformation in an Electrical Field

2006· article· en· W1577572515 on OpenAlexaff
Graeme Supeene, Charles Robert Koch, S. Bhattacharjee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrowettingMicrofluidicsDeformation (meteorology)Electric fieldFinite element methodTransient (computer programming)MechanicsField (mathematics)Materials scienceComputer simulationDielectricClassical mechanicsPhysicsComputer scienceNanotechnologyEngineeringStructural engineeringOptoelectronicsComposite materialMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deformation of droplets in an externally imposed electrical field is a widely studied phenomenon, and is an important component of microfluidic operations involving electrical actuation of droplets. In this study, we explore a general numerical formulation for the deformation of droplets under an imposed electrical field. The solution is presented for two perfect dielectrics carring no free charge. The numerical solutions are first compared with an asymptotic analytic result for small deformations to assess the accuracy of the method. Following this, the dynamics of the deformation are presented to characterize the typical response times of droplets subjected to a step change in the electric field. The results provide the basis for modeling the dynamic response and control strategies for manipulating the droplets, and may provide considerable insight into microfluidic operations based on electrowetting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207