MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577793435 · doi:10.3233/npm-14814026

Successful treatment of neonatal hemochromatosis as gestational alloimmune liver disease with intravenous immunoglobulin

2014· article· en· W1577793435 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina Jiménez‐Rivera, Ankur Gupta, Jana Feberova, J.A. de Nanassy, Margaret P. Boland

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTransplacentalFetusExchange transfusionHemochromatosisAntibodyLiver diseaseImmunologyIn uteroHydrops fetalisLiver transplantationPregnancyGastroenterologyInternal medicineTransplantationPlacentaBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal hemochromatosis (NH) is a rare, often fatal disorder characterized by liver failure and hepatic and extrahepatic iron overload. Clinical manifestations can occur in utero or immediately after birth. Evidence suggests that most cases are due to a gestational disease with transplacental transfer of maternal IgG antibodies targeting the fetal liver resulting in immune injury. The alloimmune target is believed to be a fetal hepatocyte cell surface antigen, with subsequent complement activation resulting in severe loss of hepatocytes and fetal iron overload. This cascade of events leads to acute liver failure and neonatal death. With gestational alloimmune liver disease (GALD) being the mechanism of liver injury in most cases of NH, a new paradigm of treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and exchange transfusion has been successfully used. We describe an extremely ill newborn with NH successfully treated with three doses of IVIG.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neonatal-Perinatal MedicineSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207