L'expérience de l'enfermement carcéral des femmes autochtones au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le present article traite de l'experience de l'enfermement des femmes autochtones au Quebec. Il s'inscrit dans un projet plus large visant a comprendre le role de l'incarceration dans la trajectoire sociale. A partir des travaux theoriques de la sociologie de l'experience et de l'exclusion sociale, nous analysons les recits de vie de sept femmes autochtones ayant connu des experiences d'enfermement carceral. Cette analyse permet d'identifier les conditions de detention, les interactions avec differents acteurs, les evenements-cles, les barrieres rencontrees ainsi que les strategies qu'elles utilisent pour faire face aux difficultes qu'elles vivent au quotidien. For several years, little research has been oriented towards the understanding of social trajectories of Aboriginal women. The present article is concerned with the experience of imprisonment lived by those women in the province of Quebec. Life stories of seven Aboriginal women with respect to their incarceration experiences are analyzed using sociology of experience and social exclusion theories. Incarceration conditions, interactions with different actors, key events, every-day life difficulties, as well as adaptative strategies are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".