MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577849429

L'expérience de l'enfermement carcéral des femmes autochtones au Québec

2005· article· fr· W1577849429 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Renée Brassard

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImprisonmentHumanitiesSociologyEthnologyPolitical scienceCriminologyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le present article traite de l'experience de l'enfermement des femmes autochtones au Quebec. Il s'inscrit dans un projet plus large visant a comprendre le role de l'incarceration dans la trajectoire sociale. A partir des travaux theoriques de la sociologie de l'experience et de l'exclusion sociale, nous analysons les recits de vie de sept femmes autochtones ayant connu des experiences d'enfermement carceral. Cette analyse permet d'identifier les conditions de detention, les interactions avec differents acteurs, les evenements-cles, les barrieres rencontrees ainsi que les strategies qu'elles utilisent pour faire face aux difficultes qu'elles vivent au quotidien. For several years, little research has been oriented towards the understanding of social trajectories of Aboriginal women. The present article is concerned with the experience of imprisonment lived by those women in the province of Quebec. Life stories of seven Aboriginal women with respect to their incarceration experiences are analyzed using sociology of experience and social exclusion theories. Incarceration conditions, interactions with different actors, key events, every-day life difficulties, as well as adaptative strategies are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207