MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577881323

Numerical breast models for commercial FDTD simulators

2009· article· en· W1577881323 on OpenAlexaff
Guangran Kevin Zhu, Boris N. Oreshkin, Emily Porter, Mark Coates, Milica Popović

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodCuboidVoxelAttenuationDebyeDielectricDebye modelRelaxation (psychology)Nuclear magnetic resonanceComputational physicsOpticsComputer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsMathematicsGeometryArtificial intelligenceCondensed matter physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract—This paper presents the development of numerical human breast models suitable for commercial finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) simulators. The geometry of the breast models is derived from images obtained from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans. To avoid assigning tissue properties to every voxel, we apply the regression tree analysis to partition the breast tissue region into cuboid regions (cells) that exhibit similar pixel intensity (and hence have similar tissue structure). The local spatial averaging performed by the analysis addresses the MRI-inherent noise. Secondly, we use dielectric and Debye material to model the heterogeneity and dispersiveness of breast tissue. We find that Debye material offers higher attenuation in the high frequency region than dielectric material. We also confirm that assuming a fixed relaxation time constant in Debye material does not significantly affect the field. I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207