MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1577926385 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0811

Wave-function visualization of core-induced interaction of a non-hydrogenic Rydberg atom in an electric field

2016· article· en· W1577926385 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wei Gao, Min Deng, Hong Cheng, Shanshan Zhang, J. B. Delos, Hongping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRydberg atomElectric fieldRydberg formulaWave functionAtomic physicsAtom (system on chip)Superposition principleStark effectBohr modelField (mathematics)Quantum mechanicsIonization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we report a wave-function visualization of the core-induced interaction of a non-hydrogenic Rydberg atom in an electric field and its resultant redistribution of the spectral line intensities. The energy levels and oscillator strengths are calculated based on an effective potential where the radial part of the wavefunction is expanded in a B-spline basis. The calculation is in good agreement with the experimental measurements of the absorption spectrum of sodium atoms in an electric field of F = 840 V/cm, both below and above the saddle point Esp. The visualization of the wavefunction for the eigenstates can help us to see how they stem from the interaction between two or more red and blue hydrogenic states. An approximate localized symmetry close to the atomic core is also observed in the wavefunctions, which accounts for the alternation of oscillator strengths in the experiment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207