MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578057688

De la malédiction littéraire : entre mélancolie, pauvreté et persécution. À propos de Brissette (Pascal), La Malédiction littéraire. Du poète crotté au génie malheureux, Montréal, Presses de l’Université de Montréal, « Socius », 2005, 413 p.

2007· article· fr· W1578057688 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Buata Malela

Bibliographic record

VenueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littérature · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtDictionPhilosophyPoetryLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le dernier ouvrage de Pascal Brissette se propose de reconstituer le mythe de la malediction litteraire sur une periode allant du Moyen Âge au XIXe siecle (p. 16). Pour saisir la complexite d’un tel sujet, Pascal Brissette choisit un axe multidisciplinaire en joignant la sociologie de la litterature, la sociocritique des textes et l’histoire de la litterature (p. 17). Son but est de reflechir a la fonction du malheur dans les processus de legitimation culturelle en etudiant les formes variees...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCOnTEXTES. Revue de sociologie de la littératureSame topicLiterature and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207