MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578242602 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.219923

Effects of acetazolamide on cerebrovascular function and breathing stability at 5050 m

2012· article· en· W1578242602 on OpenAlexaff
Jui‐Lin Fan, Keith R. Burgess, Kate N. Thomas, Samuel J. E. Lucas, James D. Cotter, Bengt Kayser, Karen C. Peebles, Philip N. Ainslie

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience of respiration and sleep
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNepal Academy of Science and TechnologyCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueOtago Medical Research Foundation
KeywordsAcetazolamideEffects of high altitude on humansCerebral blood flowBreathingAnesthesiaMedicineAltitude (triangle)Internal medicineCardiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the many actions of the carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, acetazolamide (ACZ), is to accelerate acclimatisation and reduce periodic breathing during sleep. The mechanism(s) by which ACZ may improve breathing stability, especially at high altitude, remain unclear. We tested the hypothesis that acute I.V. ACZ would enhance cerebrovascular reactivity to CO₂ at altitude, and thereby lower ventilatory drive and improve breathing stability during wakefulness. We measured arterial blood gases, minute ventilation (˙VE) and middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv) before and 30 min following ACZ administration (I.V. 10 mg kg⁻¹) in 12 healthy participants at sea level and following partial acclimatisation to altitude (5050 m).Measures were made at rest and during changes in end-tidal PCO₂ and PO₂ (isocapnic hypoxia). At sea level, ACZ increased resting MCAv and its reactivity to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia (P < 0.05), and lowered resting VE, arterial O₂ saturation (Sa,O₂ ) and arterial PO₂ (Pa,O₂) (P < 0.05); arterial PCO₂ (Pa,CO₂ ) was unaltered (P > 0.05). At altitude, ACZ also increased resting MCAv and its reactivity to both hypocapnia and hypercapnia (resting MCAv and hypocapnia reactivity to a greater extent than at sea level). Moreover, ACZ at altitude elevated Pa,CO₂ and again lowered resting Pa,O₂ and Sa,O₂ (P <0.05). Although the ˙VE sensitivity to hypercapnia or isocapnic hypoxia was unaltered following ACZ at both sea level and altitude (P > 0.05), breathing stability at altitude was improved (e.g. lower incidence of ventilatory oscillations and variability of tidal volume; P < 0.05). Our data indicate that I.V. ACZ elevates cerebrovascular reactivity and improves breathing stability at altitude, independent of changes in peripheral or central chemoreflex sensitivities. We speculate that Pa,CO₂-mediated elevations in cerebral perfusion and an enhanced cerebrovascular reactivity may partly account for the improved breathing stability following ACZ at high altitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNeuroscience of respiration and sleepFrench-language works237,207