MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578263179 · doi:10.1086/318919

Submillimeter Imaging of a Protocluster Region at [CLC][ITAL]z[/ITAL][/CLC] = 3.09

2001· article· en· W1578263179 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJames Clerk Maxwell TelescopeBolometerTelescopeFlux (metallurgy)SerpensOptical depthDetectorField (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We have used the Submillimeter Common-User Bolometer Array (SCUBA) detector on the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope to measure bright submillimeter emission associated with a recently discovered extensive (>100 h -1 kpc) and highly luminous "blob" of Lyα emission at z = 3.09. The blob lies within a known large overdensity of optical sources in the z = 3.07-3.11 range and is centered on a locally overdense peak within this region. The best explanation for the copious submillimeter emission is a dust-obscured continuum source, which may produce the ionizing flux for the Lyα cloud. Cooling gas explanations are plausible but excessively complicated, and the 450/850 μm ratio rules out a significant fraction of the signal arising from the Sunyaev-Zeldovich increment. At least two additional ≃10 mJy submillimeter detections in the SCUBA map, with a surface density significantly higher than in blank-field surveys, suggest that they may be associated with the z = 3.09 structure. A SCUBA "photometry" observation of a second nearby Lyα blob tentatively detects a weaker submillimeter counterpart.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical JournalSame topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207