Modified USB Security Token for User Authentication
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
- Computer security has been a significant importance in today’s world. Many researches have been done in order to improve the security services with encryption and decryption of sensitive. In addition, Security protocols have been developed to protect accessing the data from the authorized users. One of these protocols is the One-Time Password (OTP) authentication in the USB security tokens. A well-known USB security Token is the Yubikey security tokens. However this token has protocol overhead and time consuming in addition to the speed and memory capacity limitations. In this paper, we have proposed a modification to the Yubikey security protocols in order to enhance the overhead, speed and size limitations in the user authentication process, in addition to increase the security factors that depend on a random number generated from the server and sent to the user via e-mail and SMS to his mobile. Experimental results have been conducted using C# programming language for the user and the server side. All the results show the efficiency improvement of our proposed protocol over the Yubikey security token in the terms of authentication factors, speed and memory size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it