MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578560112 · doi:10.4103/0028-3886.158211

Acute ischemic stroke with tandem/terminal ICA occlusion - CT perfusion based case selection for mechanical recanalization

2015· article· en· W1578560112 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology India · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisOcclusionInternal carotid arteryPerfusion scanningStroke (engine)Cerebral blood flowTissue plasminogen activatorReperfusion therapyPerfusionMiddle cerebral arteryCerebral infarctionCardiologyInternal medicineRadiologyIschemiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Rapid reperfusion in a patient with a favorable penumbral pattern is crucial to achieving a good outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Recanalization rates for tandem and terminal internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion are better with endovascular management as compared with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) alone. We hypothesize that tissue-based selection would enable the identification of the ideal patient most suited for reperfusion therapy. We present our series of patients who developed tandem or terminal ICA occlusion and were selected for endovascular management based on their computed tomography (CT) perfusion (CTP) imaging. RESULTS: In this prospective study, 14 (29.16%) of the 48 patients treated by endovascular intervention between January 2011 and March 2014 had either tandem or terminal ICA occlusion. In the tandem group, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) 2b/3 reperfusion and a good outcome was observed in five (71.42%, n = 7) and six patients (85.71%, n = 6), respectively. Among the terminal ICA occlusion group, TICI 2b/3 reperfusion and a good outcome was observed in three (42.8%, n = 7) and two patients (28.5%, n = 7), respectively. In patients with early reperfusion, a strong correlation with a median difference of one, in cerebral blood volume (CBV) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on CBV map and post-procedure 24-h non-contrast CT, was noted. The median imaging-to-puncture and puncture-to -meaningful reperfusion time was 70 and 68.5 min, respectively, and, overall, good outcomes were seen in 57.1% of the patients. CONCLUSION: The cerebral blood volume (CBV) core estimation reliably predicted the final infarct volume. The key reasons for the significantly better outcomes seen in our cohort were the stringent perfusion imaging-based patient selection and the rapid reperfusion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.754

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it