Educational steps adopted in post-operative period of prostatectomy: an integrative review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: identifying the educational steps used in patients in the postoperative prostatectomy and establishing a relationship between these measures and the Letters of Health Promotion. Method: an integrative review, with a view to answering the question << What educational measures were adopted in the postoperative period of prostatectomy? It searched at the bases SciVerse Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Medical Publications, Latin American and Caribbean Literature of Health Sciences and The Cochrane Library, between October and November 2012. For the analysis it was used a validated instrument for filing, it was built table and a figure. Results: main educational measures: delivery of educational material, psychosocial and physiological care, support groups, and particular orientation and training. The Ottawa Charter and the Declaration of Santafe were related to all measures. Conclusion: employing the principles of promoting health coadunated with educational measures is important for self-care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it