MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578593995 · doi:10.7202/1011525ar

Images de la nature dans les romans de la Grande Guerre : esquisse d’une typologie

2012· article· fr· W1578593995 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Pierre Schoentjes

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes littéraires · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans un des meilleurs témoignages qui nous restent de la Grande Guerre, le Belge Deauville écrit : « La guerre, au milieu du spectacle coloré et changeant de la nature, est une chose mécanique, surajoutée, comme une voie de chemin de fer qui court dans un site de montagne ». Il annonce là, cinquante ans avant que le critique américain Léo Marx ne s’en empare, le paradigme selon lequel peuvent s’organiser pour l’homme les rapports conflictuels entre la nature et la guerre. S’appuyant sur un corpus important et qui montre la diversité des images à travers lesquelles 14-18 se donne à lire dans la littérature de fiction, cette contribution esquisse une typologie qui espère contribuer à baliser ce vaste champ thématique. Elle fournira l’occasion de nous arrêter aux six catégories majeures, sur un éventail qui se déploie de l’Arcadie à l’Apocalypse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes littérairesSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207