MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<scp>e</scp>‐Commerce Business Models

2015· other· en· W1578738633 on OpenAlexaff
Richard Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDigital Platforms and Economics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusiness modelContext (archaeology)BusinessNew business developmentArtifact-centric business process modelElectronic businessBusiness-to-businessIndustrial organizationProcess managementBusiness process modelingMarketingBusiness processWork in process

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This entry reviews early discussion of the importance of business models in the development of electronic commerce in the 1990s, the challenges of defining what a business model is in this context, and more recent emphasis on the role of business models in planning, managing, and shaping sector or industry assets and costs within networking configurations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.554

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1660.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and SocietySame topicDigital Platforms and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207