MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578786264 · doi:10.24452/sjer.31.2.5099

L’insertion professionnelle en enseignement : Validation d’un modèle inspiré de Bronfenbrenner

2009· article· fr· W1578786264 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSwiss Journal of Educational Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPsychologyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En éducation, la transition de la formation à la pratique professionnelle demeure un phénomène complexe. Nous avons donc entrepris de tester un modèle de l’insertion professionnelle en enseignement inspiré de celui de Bronfenbrenner. Ce modèle situe le novice au centre de systèmes concentriques et a inspiré six hypothèses que nous avons testées. Trois institutions ont pris part à ce projet, soit les HEP BEJUNE, de Fribourg et du Valais. Un échantillon de 186 novices a répondu à un questionnaire au printemps 2006. La modélisation d’équations structurelles a permis de tester les relations entre des variables touchant à la perception de compétence, aux conditions de travail, à la formation initiale et au succès perçu de l’insertion. Nos résultats soulignent l’importance des conditions à l’embauche et de la satisfaction au travail sur la perception du succès de l’insertion et l’engagement à l’école.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.366
GPT teacher head0.535
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it