KONTRIBUSI PAJAK RESTORAN TERHADAP PENDAPATAN ASLI DAERAH KABUPATEN BREBES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pembangunan adalah suatu proses kegiatan yang dilakukan dalam rangka mengadakan perubahan-perubahan ke arah keadaan yang lebih baik.Kondisi perekonomian di Indonesia dilihat dari segi perekonomian makro mengalami beberapa peningkatan, tetapi dari segi perekonomian mikro mengalami penurunan karena masih banyak pengangguran di Indonesia.Usaha mencapai tujuan pembangunan tersebut, Pemerintah menciptakan tahap-tahap pelaksanaanya, baik untuk jangka panjang maupun jangka pendek yang meliputi: perencanaan, pelaksanaan, pembiayaan, pengawasan dan evaluasi dengan tidak mengecilkan arti peran dari pihak-pihak lainnya dalam partisipasi mensukseskan pembangunan nasional maupun daerah. Diantara penjelasan di atas pada Kabupaten Brebes, pendapatan daerah yang paling menonjol yaitu dari sektor Pajak Daerah. Pajak Daerah adalah pajak yang ditetapkan oleh Daerah untuk kepentingan pembiayaan daerah tersebut. Di Kabupaten Brebes, pajak daerah dapat diklasifikasikan meenjadi beberapa jenis pajak, antara lain : 1) Pajak Hotel; 2) Pajak Restoran; 3) Pajak Hiburan; 4) Pajak Reklame; 5) Pajak Penerangan Jalan; 6) Pajak Pengambilan Bahan Galian Golongan C; 7) Pajak Air Bawah Tanah; 8) Pajak Sarang Burung Walet; 9) Bea Perolehan Hak atas tanah dan Bangunan.Kata kunci: Pajak, perekonomian makro, Kabupaten Brebes, pajak daerah.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.049 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".