MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1578799432 · doi:10.4000/civilisations.193

«Angakkuuniq» et «ilisiiqsiniq»

2006· article· fi· W1578799432 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frédéric Laugrand

Bibliographic record

VenueCivilisations · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefi
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsMinistère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec)Université du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesEthnologyArtSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir de divers matériaux ethnographiques recueillis dans plusieurs régions du Nord canadien, ce texte traite de la fonction offensive du chamanisme inuit. L’auteur s’intéresse au rôle du chamane dans la reproduction du désordre et des conflits inter-familiaux. Même si l’histoire récente et avec elle la multiplication des disparités sociales a contribué à différencier chamanisme et sorcellerie, ces pratiques appartiennent au même complexe symbolique. Le chamanisme inuit apparaît comme un système foncièrement instable et le chamane comme une personne ressource en même temps qu’une menace permanente pour sa propre société. Cette ambivalence explique l’attitude des aînés qui, tout en valorisant les traditions chamaniques restent aujourd’hui encore très réticents à l’idée d’un retour à ces pratiques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.759
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0080.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivilisationsSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207