MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Temporary loss of plasma membrane integrity in orthodontic tooth movement

2005· article· en· W1578895333 on OpenAlexaff
MF Orellana‐Lezcano, PW Major, PL McNeil, JL Borke

Bibliographic record

VenueOrthodontics and Craniofacial Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryImmunoelectron microscopyMolarPeriodontal fiberCell biologyMembraneFluorescence recovery after photobleachingBiophysicsPathologyBiologyMedicineDentistryBiochemistryImmunohistochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In these studies, a rat model of orthodontic tooth movement was used to support the premise that periodontal ligament (PDL) cells experience plasma membrane disruption and resealing events upon application of mechanical stress. Immunoelectron microscopy, showed albumin in the cytoplasm of PDL and bone lining cells in the tension side of moved molars. The intracellular localization of this large molecule (60 KDa) suggests that these cells have undergone plasma membrane disruption and resealing. To further assess these and previous findings, fluorescent dyes (FITC-dextran and rhodamine-dextran) were delivered into the vascular system followed by application of 50 g of static load. These large dextran molecules (10 KDa) were preferentially taken up by PDL cells of the buccal (tension side) of moved molars. These cells were determined to be viable since dead cells do not retain these diffusible tracers. These studies provide evidence of a novel cellular mechanism for uptake and release of molecules and suggest a potential role for plasma membrane disruption in the mechanotransduction of orthodontic tooth movement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.548

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrthodontics and Craniofacial ResearchSame topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207