Identités queer : diaspora et organisation ethnoculturelle et transnationale des lesbiennes et des gais à Toronto
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article examine les modèles d’organisation des lesbiennes, gais, bisexuels et transgenres (LGBT) dans les communautés ethnoculturelles de Toronto au Canada. On y soutient que de nouvelles formes d’organisation et d’identité locales voient le jour dans les communautés queer, formes qui remettent en question les espaces traditionnels des politiques des mouvements sociaux et la place de choix accordée à l’État-nation en tant que principal niveau d’analyse de la situation des LGBT sous l’angle des droits humains. Plutôt que de s’appuyer sur le concept d’une identité lesbienne et gaie homogène et bien ancrée, l’article décrit les formes multiples que prennent les identités LGBT sous l’effet de l’accélération de la migration, de la création et du renforcement des diasporas et de l’intensification de la diversité ethnoculturelle des centres urbains.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".