MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The combined influence of fat consumption and repeated mental stress on brachial artery flow‐mediated dilatation: a preliminary study

2014· article· en· W1579004414 on OpenAlexaff
Veronica J. Poitras, David J. Slattery, Brendan M. Levac, Stevenson Fergus, Brendon J. Gurd, Kyra E. Pyke

Bibliographic record

VenueExperimental Physiology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPostprandialBrachial arteryMental stressMealCalorieMedicineEndothelial dysfunctionInternal medicineEndotheliumSupine positionCardiologyEndocrinologyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New Findings What is the central question of this study? Both a high‐fat meal and acute mental stress can impair conduit artery endothelial function. The objective of this study was to determine whether the combination of a high‐fat meal and repeated postprandial stressful tasks would exacerbate dysfunction versus either stimulus alone. What is the main finding and its importance? Endothelial function was modestly greater when the postprandial state was accompanied by mental stress. Thus, in healthy subjects acute stress may confer protection from a negative impact of food consumption, possibly due in part to a stress‐induced reduction in plasma phosphorus levels. These findings challenge the position of acute mental stress as universally detrimental to endothelial function. Experienced separately, both acute mental stress and high‐fat meal consumption can transiently impair endothelial function, and the purpose of the present study was to investigate their combined impact. On four separate days, 10 healthy men (23 years old) underwent brachial artery flow‐mediated dilatation (FMD) tests, before and hourly for 4 h post‐consumption of a high‐fat (HFM; 54 g fat) or low‐fat meal (LFM; 0 g fat; each meal ∼1000 calories), with hourly mental stress (mental arithmetic, speech) or control (counting) tasks (conditions HFM+S, LFM+S, HFM and LFM). Data are presented as means ± SD. Plasma triglycerides increased and remained elevated after the high‐fat but not the low‐fat meal ( P = 0.004) and were not affected by mental stress ( P = 0.329). Indices of stress reactivity increased during mental stress tasks (mean arterial pressure, ∼∆20 mmHg; heart rate, ∼∆22 beats min −1 ; salivary cortisol, ∼∆2.37 nmol l −1 ; and plasma noradrenaline, ∼∆0.17 ng ml −1 ) and were not influenced by meal ( P > 0.05). There was no effect of the type of meal on FMD ( P = 0.562); however, FMD was 4.5 ± 0.5% in the control conditions and 5.8 ± 0.6% in the mental stress conditions ( P = 0.087), and this difference was significant when normalized for the shear stress stimulus (FMD/area under the curve of shear stress, P = 0.045). Overall, these preliminary data suggest that postprandial FMD was augmented with mental stress irrespective of meal type. These results are contrary to previous reports of impaired endothelial function after mental stress or fat consumption independently and highlight the need to further investigate the mechanisms underlying the interactions between these factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExperimental PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207