Sociodemographic Characteristics of Learners and Participation in Computer Conferencing
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between learners' sociodemographic characteristics and their level of participation in computer conferencing. A quantitative study of participation among 30 learners in a noncredit agricultural leadership development program provides the empirical data for this exploration. The relationships between learner participation and six sociodemographic variables are explored: sex, age, education level, occupation, residence in urban or rural areas, and region of residence in Canada. Holding a university degree and living in an urban area are found to be the strongest predictors of participation. Recognizing that a considerable amount of variability in learners' participation in computer conferences may reflect those learners' sociodemographic characteristics has important implications for the design and facilitation of such conferences. Cet article explore les relations entre les caracteristiques socio-demographiques des apprenants et leurs niveaux de participation aux conferences telematiques. Une etude quantitative de la participation de trente personnes a un programme non-credite de developpement du leadership en agriculture constitue les donnees empiriques de cette recherche. Les relations entre les apprenants, leurs participations et six variables socio-demographiques sont analysees : le sexe, l'âge, le niveau d'education, l'occupation, le milieu urbain ou rural et le lieu de residence au Canada. Les variables « possedant un diplome universitaire » et « residant en milieu urbain » sont les predicteurs les plus susceptible d'une participation positive des apprenants. Reconnaitre que la grande variabilite de la participation des apprenants aux conferences telematiques peut decouler de leurs caracteristiques socio-demographiques a des implications importantes dans la planification de telles conferences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it