L’évolution des collaborations scientifiques entre le Québec, le Canada et l’Union européenne (1980-2009)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article analyse l’évolution des relations entre les chercheurs québécois, canadiens et leurs homologues des pays membres de l’Union européenne sur une période de 30 ans. Une analyse quantitative des publications scientifiques et de leurs caractéristiques permet de construire une cartographie utile et éclairante des relations scientifiques internationales et de leur évolution dans le temps, et ce tant à l’échelle des pays, des provinces que des institutions. Ce type d’analyse peut non seulement s’avérer utile pour évaluer les effets de politiques d’internationalisation, mais aussi servir d’outil pour les orienter de façon à ce qu’elles soient cohérentes avec les choix des chercheurs qui, en suivant la logique propre à leur champ de spécialisation, tissent leurs réseaux internationaux de façon à maximiser les chances de réussite de leurs recherches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".