MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1579291522

Curiouser and Curiouser: An exploration of surrealism in two illustrators of Lewis Carroll’s Alice

2011· article· en· W1579291522 on OpenAlexaff
Siri Hiltz

Bibliographic record

VenueLooking Glass : New Perspectives on Children's Literature · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Gender, and Advertising
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDreamAlice (programming language)GirlArtWhite (mutation)Art historyEpiphanyPerformance artLiteraturePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Growing, shrinking, white knights and caucus races, infants, piglets and games of croquet; the magical and confusing world that Alice falls into fits snugly within the surrealist dream. Lewis Carroll’s fantastic tale of a young girl immersed in a dream world epitomizes many of the goals and ideals of the surrealist movement. This article compares the illustrations of Carroll's story by John Tenniel and by Salvador Dali, examining how the two styles might present the surrealist vision of the story.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0210.022
Scholarly communication0.0110.006
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLooking Glass : New Perspectives on Children's LiteratureSame topicMedia, Gender, and AdvertisingFrench-language works237,207