MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1579330142

Semi-Automatic Snake-Based Segmentation of Carotid Artery Ultrasound Images

2010· article· en· W1579330142 on OpenAlexaff
Sherif G. Moursi, Mahmoud R. El-Sakka

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications of The Arab Computer Society · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMedical Image Segmentation Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContouringActive contour modelArtificial intelligenceComputer visionSegmentationRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceUltrasoundSensitivity (control systems)Image segmentationPattern recognition (psychology)RadiologyMedicineEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carotid ultrasound imaging is one of the clinical diagnostic procedures that can be employed to detect plaque buildup at the carotid artery walls. It is an inexpensive and non-invasive procedure that has no known side effects. Yet, the acquired ultrasound images have poor quality and contain a lot of noise. Active contouring segmentation techniques (also known as snakes or deformable model) are characterized by their robustness to both image noise and boundary gaps. Hence, they are suitable to be used to segment noisy poor quality ultrasound images. One of the major issues of active contouring methods is their sensitivity to the initial contour that is provided by the user. Unless it is drawn close enough to the actual contour, it may lead to unsatisfactory results. Thus, most active contour algorithms require considerable user interaction to provide a good initial contour. This paper presents an efficient algorithm for extracting carotid artery lumens in ultrasound images. It starts by utilizing a rule-based scheme to generate an initial contour for the lumen. This contour is refined using a snake scheme, after carefully adjusting its energies. Our algorithm reduces the user interaction, as the user is only required to place a seed point inside the region of interest. It is worth mentioning that our proposed initial contour generation scheme can be easily integrated as an independent module with any active contouring algorithm. Sensitivity, precision rate, and overlap ratio are utilized to assess the performance of the proposed scheme. The results show that the extracted initial and final contours have a good overlap with contours that are manually segmented by an experienced clinician.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications of The Arab Computer SocietySame topicMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207