MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1579521332 · doi:10.21083/irss.v31i0.495

Andrew Wylie, <i>Just Being There: With Bears and Tigers in the North Sea & Susan Edwards, The Kids Who Saved the World</i>

2008· article· en· W1579521332 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Graeme Morton

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review of Scottish Studies · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChildren's Rights and Participation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoryOceanographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are surely not many who still regard the Scottish Kirk as a rather stern and colourless religious experience.But for those who may retain some doubts, then reading the life and times of Rev. Andrew Wylie will have very much the same effect of a cold shower after a cross-country run: to invigorate.Wylie's cold shower came from his time as the first Chaplain to the North Sea oil industry.Preparation for this role came from a stint in the Royal Navy, 'offshore' as a former Minister in the Scots Kirk in Lausanne, first General Secretary of the Scottish Churches Council and former industrial chaplain at Inverclyde.Broad and challenging experiences, yet it was inevitably a struggle to convince the oil industry of a chaplain's role amongst the hard grit and bottom dollar concerns of their business.His appointment came in 1985, but before he could visit his first platform, the North Sea oil fields suffered their first major accident.A Chinook helicopter ditched into the sea just off Sumburgh airport in Shetland, killing all but two of the 47 people on board (p.9).Wylie, and all those involved, could 'just be there'.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review of Scottish StudiesSame topicChildren's Rights and ParticipationFrench-language works237,207