MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1579580202 · doi:10.1109/milcom.2005.1605809

The Probability Distribution of the Carrier-to-Interference Ratio (CIR) of a CSMA/CA Ad Hoc Wireless Network

2006· article· en· W1579580202 on OpenAlexaff
S.A. Qasmi, Kainam Thomas Wong

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMobile Ad Hoc Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWireless ad hoc networkComputer scienceRayleigh fadingNode (physics)Monte Carlo methodComputer networkNakagami distributionStochastic geometry models of wireless networksFadingTopology (electrical circuits)AlgorithmOptimized Link State Routing ProtocolMathematicsWirelessStatisticsTelecommunicationsPhysicsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work is first in the open literature to characterize the probability distribution (not merely the mean and variance) of the carrier-to-interference ratio (CIR) of an ad hoc CSMA/CA wireless communication network, via Monte Carlo simulations. This paper is also first in the open literature to model an ad hoc network accounting for all following factors: (1) more realistically modeling of the network nodes' spatial distribution via a two-dimensional Poisson process whereby network nodes are randomly placed at arbitrary two-dimensional plane (instead of nodes locating deterministically at only regular grid points), (2) suppression of nodes within the carrier sensing range of a transmitting node to micmac the CSMA/CA medium access control (MAC) protocol (i.e. nodes self-restrain from transmission when neighboring a transmitting node), (3) microscopic Rayleigh fading, (4) propagation-distance-dependent path-loss and (5) more than one service class. Monte Carlo simulations of a CSMA/CA ad hoc network generate CIR data, whose probability distribution function and parameters are identified via least-squares curve-fitting. The inverse normal distribution is the most well-rounded distribution, in the sense of providing a good fit (if not the best fit) to all nine Monte-Carlo simulation scenarios. The Rayleigh is the best univariate pdf. It can fit all scenarios very well, except the case without micro-fading and low pathless. All pdf's can sufficiently fit the data when k=4 Nakagami is the best bivariate pdf with LMSE les1, except the case without micro-fading and low-pathloss (with distance-dependent power-loss exponent k=2). The bivariate Nakagami improves over the best univariate fit (namely, Rayleigh). The trivariate Fisk & quadravariate Burr can fit all scenarios with LMSE les 1. The quadravariate Burr often cuts the trivariate Fisks LMSE by half. The trivariate Fisk cuts the bivariate inverted-normals LMSE often by 2/3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMobile Ad Hoc NetworksFrench-language works237,207