MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1579582497

Abstract 19528: Biomechanical Properties of Patient-specific Aortas and Pulmonary Arteries According to Aortic Valve Phenotype: Relevance to the Ross Procedure

2014· article· en· W1579582497 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre Olivier Dionne, Evan Wener, Rosaire Mongrain, Richard L. Leask, Nancy Poirier, Raymond Cartier, Ismaı̈l El-Hamamsy

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyBicuspid valveBicuspid aortic valvePulmonary arteryInternal medicineAortic valveAortaArtery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Long-term outcomes of the Ross procedure can be limited by late autograft dilatation requiring reoperation. It has been suggested that bicuspid aortic valve is a risk factor for autograft dilatation. The aim of this study is to compare the biomechanical properties of pulmonary arteries according to aortic valve phenotype. Methods: At the time of surgery, segments of aortic and pulmonary artery wall were harvested according to aortic valve phenotype (n=29 patients). The segments were subjected to displacement-controlled biaxial stretch testing within 8 hours of surgery, in a physiological solution (37 C). Tissue stiffness at an engineering strain of 60% was evaluated, using engineering stress. Histological analyses were performed on the specimens to assess the number of elastic lamellae. Aortic valve phenotype was bicuspid in 18 patients (62%), unicuspid in 7 patients (24%) and tricuspid in 4 patients (14%). Results: Pulmonary artery circumferential and longitudinal elastic moduli were similar among the 3 populations (Unicuspid: 0.11±0.05 and 0.09±0.03 MPa, bicuspid: 0.10±0.05 and 0.11±0.05 MPa, tricuspid:0.14±0.07 and 0.09±0.05 MPa, p=0.462 and p=0.621 respectively). Aortic circumferential and longitudinal elastic moduli were also similar among the 3 populations (Unicuspid: 0.13±0.01 and 0.12±0.05 MPa , bicuspid: 0.17±0.06 MPa and 0.14±0.06 MPa, tricuspid: 0.09 MPa and 0.11 MPa , p=0.188 and p=0.720 respectively). Aortic and pulmonary artery thickness were also similar among the 3 populations (Unicuspid: 1.53±0.16 mm and 1.22±0.29 mm, bicuspid: 1.65±0.33 mm and 1.20±0.32 mm, tricuspid: 2.12 and 1.38±0.15, p=0.248 and p=0.566, respectively). Pulmonary artery lamellae unit count was also similar among the 3 populations (tricuspid: 30 units, bicuspid: 43±9 units and unicuspid: 30 units, p=0.10). The number of elastic lamellae was also similar in aortic specimens (tricuspid: 52 units, bicuspid: 60±11 units, unicuspid: 52 units, p=0.640). Conclusion: Current findings suggest that the biomechanical properties of pulmonary arteries obtained from patients undergoing the Ross procedure are independent of aortic valve phenotype. These results may have significant impact on the long-term clinical outcomes following this procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicAortic Disease and Treatment Approaches→French-language works237,207→