"Having New Eyes": Spaces of Archives, Landscapes of Power
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
by an Act of Parliament, and conceived as "A New Knowledge Institution for Canada," Library and Archives Canada takes as its Mission to serve Canada as "a source of enduring knowledge accessible to all, contributing to the cultural, social and economic advancement of Canada as a free and democratic society."Despite its name, Library and Archives Canada represents not a simple "merger" but a "transformation" of the former National Archives of Canada and National Library of Canada.Ian Wilson, Librarian and Archivist of Canada, expressed his vision for the new institution, stating: "We will be building on the strong foundations of our two predecessor institutions, their collections, their traditions and, most especially, their expertise.With these we will be ready to face the challenges, possibilities and expectations of the 21st century."For more on Library and Archives Canada, go to: <http://www.collectionscanada.ca/>and click on "About Us" (accessed 1 April 2006). 2 "The quest for knowledge rather than information is the crux of the study of archives and of the daily work of the archivist.... Quite simply, archivists must transcend mere information, and mere information
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it