Experiência materna de perda de um filho com câncer infantil: um estudo fenomenológico
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The death of a child due to cancer reflects a premature end of life and can cause strong repercussions to the mother who is the one that usually takes most responsibility during child's treatment. Recognizing the importance of the topic, this research seeks to understand the experience of a mother who experienced the loss of a child due to cancer. This is a qualitative, phenomenological research that uses a method called "narrative", which consists in a semi-structured interview. The research is set up as a case study, with the participation of one mother and was developed in a non-governmental organization that supports children with cancer, located in the city of Natal-RN. The proposed analysis is based Heideggerian hermeneutics. This study pointed to three themes: previous history, childhood illness and its repercussions; the network of support and care, and the loss and afterwards: coping and meaning. It is concluded that the experience of child cancer allows each mother to face ontological sense of human helplessness, mobilizing change and that the guarantee of care during the illness and loss of their sons, favors an authentic experience of mourning and the opening for new possibilities in their lives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it