MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 16709: Contrasting Influences of Renal Function on Blood Pressure and HbA1c Reductions With Empagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Hypertension

2014· article· en· W1579878066 on OpenAlexaff
David Z.I. Cherney, Mark E. Cooper, Ilkka Tikkanen, Susanne Crowe, Odd Erik Johansen, Søren S. Lund, Hans J. Woerle, Uli C. Broedl, Thomas Hach

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsToronto General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpagliflozinMedicineEMPARenal functionBlood pressureType 2 diabetesInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyKidney diseaseUrologyCardiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin (EMPA) reduces HbA1c, weight and blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). While glucose lowering with EMPA is dependent on renal function, the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on BP reduction with EMPA is less well understood. Our aim was to determine if impaired renal function attenuates antihypertensive effects of EMPA. A Phase III randomized placebo (PBO)-controlled trial (EMPA-REG BP™) investigated the efficacy and safety of EMPA in patients with T2D and hypertension (defined as mean seated office systolic BP [SBP] 130-159 mmHg and diastolic BP [DBP] 80-99 mmHg at screening). Patients (mean [SD] age 60.2 [9.0] years, HbA1c 7.90 [0.74] %, 24-hour SBP 131.4 [12.3] and 24-hour DBP 75.0 [7.8] mmHg) received EMPA 10 mg (n=276), EMPA 25 mg (n=276) or PBO (n=271) once daily for 12 weeks. We assessed changes from baseline in mean ambulatory 24-hour SBP and HbA1c in subgroups by baseline eGFR (MDRD equation), adjusting for differences in baseline mean 24-hour SBP (for SBP analyses only), HbA1c, region, number of antihypertensive medications, treatment, eGFR and treatment by eGFR interaction between groups. In patients with normal renal function, or stage 2 or 3 CKD, EMPA significantly reduced HbA1c and mean 24-hour SBP vs PBO (Table). As expected, PBO-corrected HbA1c reductions with EMPA appeared to decrease with decreasing eGFR (Table). In contrast, PBO-corrected reductions in mean 24-hour SBP with EMPA mostly appeared to increase with decreasing eGFR (Table). Unlike HbA1c, mean 24-hour SBP reductions with EMPA in patients with T2D and hypertension appear to be greater in patients with lower eGFR, indicating that SBP modulation with EMPA may involve pathways other than urinary glucose excretion such as diuretic effects, weight loss, improved glycemic control, reduced arterial stiffness or direct vascular effects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicDiabetes Treatment and Management→French-language works237,207→