MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580071239

Tabu search for shipping dangerous goods in a rail-truck network

2011· article· en· W1580071239 on OpenAlexaff
Manish Verma, Nicolas Zufferey

Bibliographic record

VenueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTruckTabu searchTrainTransport engineeringComputer scienceOperations researchMetaheuristicRouting (electronic design automation)Vehicle routing problemPath (computing)Set (abstract data type)GraphVariable (mathematics)Function (biology)Variable neighborhood searchMathematical optimizationAutomotive engineeringEngineeringComputer networkMathematicsAlgorithm
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The problem considered in this paper consists of planning and routing rail-truck intermodal shipments from a set of suppliers to a set of clients. The delivered quantities have to follow a truck-rail-truck intermodal path. There are three constraints to satisfy: the satisfaction of the demand is mandatory, each request should be delivered by its due date, and the capacity of a train cannot be exceeded. The objective function to minimize is a weighted summation of the cost and the risk. The former component concerns the fixed and variable transportation costs associated with trucks and trains, while the latter associated with dangerous goods is non-linear for trains. We propose a graph model to represent this problem and a tabu search metaheuristic to tackle it. Numerical experiments on realistic data are provided and discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva)Same topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207