Modern Trends in Dynamics and Structure of Working Capital of the Russian Economics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the modern context of innovational development, structural changes in manufacturing, global changes on product and stock markets, increase in influence of tax system and other factors of government regulation, quality changes take place in the whole reproduction process including working capital functioning. The present article substantiates changes in the dynamics and structure of working capital in the Russian economy and gives analysis forces affecting it. Research was carried out at the macroeconomic level on the basis of official statistics for the period of 1993-2012 about structure of working capital, current liquidity and organizations’ accounts payable upon obligations published in the website of the Federal service of state statistics and also upon main indicators of market of state short-term bonds (GKO) and federal loan bonds (OFZ), indicated in the website of the Central bank of Russia.The article substantiates changes of the working capital’s structure in the Russian economics which include reduction of stocks share, increase in monetary funds and other financial assets. Much attention is given to changes in structure of financial sources forming the working capital, increase in money supply that contributes to instability of the money market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".