MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1580198733 · doi:10.7202/043801ar

LOUISE JACQUES, Les recours hypothécaires, 2E ÉD., COLL. « POINTS DE DROIT », COWANSVILLE, ÉDITIONS YVON BLAIS, 2003, 405 P., ISBN 2-89451-700-9.

2004· article· fr· W1580198733 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Édith Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de droit · 2004
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

LOUISE JACQUES, Les recours hypothécaires, 2E ÉD., COLL. « POINTS DE DROIT », COWANSVILLE, ÉDITIONS YVON BLAIS, 2003, 405 P., ISBN 2-89451-700-9.. Un article de la revue Les Cahiers de droit (Volume 45, numéro 2, 2004, p. 219-406) diffusée par la plateforme Érudit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de droitSame topicMigration, Identity, and HealthFrench-language works237,207